• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:何立成,朱社敏,谢珍,沈琴,钱飞飞,匡荣.鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法用于评价化妆品眼刺激性的可行性研究[J].中国现代应用药学,2017,34(8):1158-1162.
HE Licheng,ZHU Shemin,XIE Zhen,SHEN Qin,QIAN Feifei,KUANG Rong.Research on the Feasibility of Using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay to Evaluate Eye Irritation of Cosmetics[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2017,34(8):1158-1162.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 3004次   下载 3587 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法用于评价化妆品眼刺激性的可行性研究
何立成1, 朱社敏1, 谢珍1, 沈琴2, 钱飞飞2, 匡荣1
1.浙江省食品药品检验研究院, 杭州 310052;2.绍兴市现代医药公共服务中心, 浙江 绍兴 312073
摘要:
目的 研究鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法(chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay,CAMVA)评价化妆品眼刺激性的可行性,并用改良后的方法对14种市售化妆品进行眼刺激性的评价。方法 通过控制样品的浓度、与鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜的接触时间,以及对评价体系的改良,尝试建立一套标准的CAMVA法评价化妆品眼刺激性的方法。结果 护肤类产品无刺激性,用后冲洗类、染发类产品的浓度、与鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜的接触时间均与刺激性大小成正比。在3%的浓度下,用后冲洗类产品的最佳接触时间为20 min,体内外试验结果一致性为90%(9/10);染发类产品为5 min,体内外试验结果一致性为100%(2/2)。结合改良后的评价体系可做到刺激性分级,体内外试验结果一致性为用后冲洗类产品80%(8/10),染发类产品50%(1/2)。结论 用CAMVA法可以对化妆品的眼刺激性进行评价,但实验条件和判定标准还需进一步优化。
关键词:  化妆品  眼刺激  鸡胚绒毛膜尿囊膜血管试验法
DOI:10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2017.08.019
分类号:R994.3
基金项目:
Research on the Feasibility of Using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay to Evaluate Eye Irritation of Cosmetics
HE Licheng1, ZHU Shemin1, XIE Zhen1, SHEN Qin2, QIAN Feifei2, KUANG Rong1
1.Zhejiang Institute of Food and Drug Control, Hangzhou 310052, China;2.Shaoxing Modern Medicine Public Service Center, Shaoxing 312073, China
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE Study on the feasibility of using Chorioallantoic Membrane Vascular Assay to evaluate eye irritation of cosmetics, and evaluating 14 kinds of cosmetics by improved method. METHODS Establish a standard method on eye irritation using CAMVA of cosmetics by controlling exposure time and sample concentration, and improving the evaluation system. RESULTS Skin care products are non-irritating. There was a positive correlation between exposure time, sample concentration and the stimulation intensity of hair dyes and after using rinse-off cosmetics. At 3% concentration, the best exposure time is 20min for after using rinse-off cosmetics, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test was 90% (9/10), and 5min for hair dyes, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test was 100%(2/2). Irritation can be graded by using the improved evaluation system, the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test of after using rinse-off cosmetics was 80% (8/10), and the classification consistency of CAMVA and Draize test of hair dyes was 50%(1/2). CONCLUSION CAMVA method can be applied to predict eye irritation of cosmetics, but the experimental conditions and evaluation system need to be further refined.
Key words:  cosmetic  eye irritation  chorioallantoic membrane vascular assay
扫一扫关注本刊微信