• 首页期刊简介编委会刊物订阅专栏专刊电子刊学术动态联系我们English
引用本文:张斌,刘慧燕.K-ras基因突变状态与西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗转移性结直肠肠癌疗效的系统评价[J].中国现代应用药学,2013,30(8):924-928.
ZHANG Bin,LIU Huiyan.Association between K-ras Mutation and Response to Cetuximab/Panitumumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2013,30(8):924-928.
【打印本页】   【HTML】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 2887次   下载 2759 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
K-ras基因突变状态与西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗转移性结直肠肠癌疗效的系统评价
张斌, 刘慧燕
浙江省江山市人民医院外科,浙江 江山 324100
摘要:
目的 评价K-ras基因突变状态与西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗mCRC疗效间的关系。方法 检索Pubmed、CENTRAL(the Cochrane Central Register of Controlledtrials)、EMBASE、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)、欧洲肿瘤协会(EMSO)官方网等,公开发表的K-ras基因突变状态与西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗mCRC疗效间关系的研究(包括前瞻性和回顾性)。应用Stata 11.0统计软件分析K-ras基因突变状态与西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗mCRC疗效间的关系。结果 共12项研究1 622例受试者纳入分析,合并分析显示:mCRC 患者中K-ras基因突变率为P=39%(95% CI:37%~44%);K-ras野生型和突变型患者西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗的客观有效率(CR+PR)分别为P=18%(95% CI:15%~26%)和P=9%(95% CI:2%~15%);与K-ras突变型相比,K-ras野生型患者西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗治疗的客观有效率优势比OR(odds ratio)=5.10(95% CI:2.84~9.14)。结论 mCRC中约有40%的患者存在K-ras基因突变,存在K-ras基因突变的患者对抗EGFR治疗(西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗)反应较差。
关键词:  转移性结直肠癌  K-ras基因  西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗  Meta分析
DOI:
分类号:
基金项目:
Association between K-ras Mutation and Response to Cetuximab/Panitumumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
ZHANG Bin, LIU Huiyan
Department of General Surgery, Jiangshan Peoples Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Jiangshan 324100, China
Abstract:
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE To evaluate relationship between the K-ras gene mutation status and response to cetuximab/panitumumab for mCRC. METHODS By searching PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBSE, CNKI, ASCO and ESMO databases, the open published studies about the relationship between the K-ras gene mutation status and response to cetuximab/panitumumab for metastatic colorectal cancer were searched. The pooled ORR for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab/panitumumab associated with the K-ras gene mutation status was calculated by statistic software Stata 11.0. RESULTS Twelve studies including 1 622 participants were include in this systematic review and Meta-analysis. The aggregated analysis showed the prevalence of K-ras mutation in mCRC was P=39%(95% CI: 37%-44%). The ORR (ORR=CR+PR) in K-ras wild type group and mutation group treated with aiti-EGFR were P=18%(95% CI: 15%-26%) and P=9%(95% CI: 2%-15%) respectively. The odds of ORR in K-ras wild type group was much higher than that in K-ras mutation group OR=5.10(95% CI: 2.84-9.14). CONCLUSION About 40% patients with mCRC have mutated K-ras gene which indicated the poor response to anti-EGFR treatment.
Key words:  metastatic colorectal cancer  K-ras gene  cetuximab/panitumumab  Meta-analysis
扫一扫关注本刊微信