| 引用本文: | 魏巍,孙烜,毛运楠,杨彦彪.药理学领域2018年国家自然科学基金面上项目结题情况分析[J].中国现代应用药学,2022,39(20):2600-2607. |
| WEI Wei,SUN Xuan,MAO Yunnan,YANG Yanbiao.Analysis of the Conclusion of the 2018 National Natural Science Foundation of China in the Field of Pharmacology[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2022,39(20):2600-2607. |
|
| 摘要: |
| 目的 分析2018年国家自然科学基金面上项目药理学(H31)领域结题项目，探讨该领域面上基金的发展现状及存在的问题，尤其是不同地区药理学领域的研究差距、不同类型研究机构以及各领域分支学科的研究现状，为药理学领域的科学工作者申报基金提供参考。方法 全面检索科学基金共享服务网(http://npd.nsfc.gov.cn/)，获取药理领域2018年国家自然科学基金面上项目已结题项目所有信息(包括项目名称、分支学科、申请人职称、依托单位、资助金额、项目关键词、著作数、专利数、获奖数、发表论文数、科学引文索引收录论文数、中国科学引文数据库收录论文数、培养研究生数)，对不同地区已结题项目情况、不同类型科研机构及不同职称的项目负责人的结题情况及成果产出效益进行分析。结果 2018年药理学领域国家自然科学基金面上基金共有结题项目119项，结题项目获助经费总额为8438万元。结题项目主要集中于东部地区。所有结题项目按依托单位的类型分类中有56项依托于综合类大学。分析不同职称项目负责人主持的结果显示，119项结题项目中有89个项目是由获得高级职称的科研人员主持完成，而且高级职称的科研人员在主要成果的产出上具有一定优势。结题项目的研究方向主要集中于抗肿瘤药物药理、神经精神药物药理等方向，其中抗肿瘤药物药理领域结题项目25项，神经精神药物药理领域结题项目22项。结论 在国家自然科学基金的支持下，药理学领域的科学研究取得显著成果；东西部地区和不同类型科研机构的成果产出效率无明显差异；不同类型依托单位的成果产出效率无明显差异；高级职称科研人员的成果产出效率相对于中级职称科研人员具有一定优势；药理学领域的研究方向相对集中在肿瘤和精神系统疾病药物领域。 |
| 关键词: 国家自然科学基金 面上基金 药理学 成果产出效益 |
| DOI：10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2022.20.005 |
| 分类号:R96 |
| 基金项目:兰州市科技计划项目(2020-ZD-109)；兰州市卫生健康科技发展项目(2021013) |
|
| Analysis of the Conclusion of the 2018 National Natural Science Foundation of China in the Field of Pharmacology |
|
WEI Wei1,2, SUN Xuan3, MAO Yunnan4, YANG Yanbiao1
|
|
1.Lanzhou First People's Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China;2.Lanzhou University, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China;3.Lanzhou University, Institute of Science and Technology Development, Lanzhou 730000, China;4.The Second People's Hospital of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China
|
| Abstract: |
| OBJECTIVE To analysis 2018 pharmacology(H31) program of national natural science fund surface area concluding project, discusses the field on the fund’s development present situation and existing problems, especially the gap between different areas in the field of pharmacology research, different types of research institutions and research status of each branch in the field of providing reference for scientific workers in the field of pharmacology declare funds.METHODS Comprehensive retrieval science fund shared service network(http://npd.nsfc.gov.cn/), and access to pharmacological field in 2018, the national natural science fund project had been finished on the surface of all project information (including project name, branch, the title, a supporting institution, financing amount, project keywords, book number, patent number, number of reward, the number of published papers, the number was included in science citation index papers, Chinese science citation database, included paper number, cultivating graduate students). The paper analyzed the completed projects in different regions, the completed projects of different types of scientific research institutions and project leaders with different professional titles, as well as the results and benefits.RESULTS In 2018, there were 119 concluding projects in the general fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China in the field of pharmacology, and the total funding for concluding projects was 84.38 million yuan. The final project focused on the eastern region. All the concluding items were classified according to the types of supporting institutions, among which 56 were supported by comprehensive universities. The analysis of the results conducted by project leaders with different professional titles showed that 89 of the 119 projects were completed by researchers with senior professional titles, and researchers with senior professional titles had certain advantages in the output of major achievements. The research directions of the concluded projects mainly focus on the pharmacology of anti-tumor drugs and neuropsychotropic drugs, among which there were 25 concluded projects in the pharmacology of anti-tumor drugs and 22 projects in the pharmacology of neuropsychotropic drugs.CONCLUSION With the support of the National Natural Science Foundation, the scientific research in pharmacology has achieved remarkable results. There is no significant difference in the output efficiency between the eastern and western regions and different types of scientific research institutions. There is no significant difference in the output efficiency of different types of supporting units. The output efficiency of senior scientific researchers has some advantages compared with that of intermediate scientific researchers. The field of pharmacology is relatively focused on the field of drugs for cancer and psychiatric diseases. |
| Key words: National Natural Science Foundation of China general fund pharmacology output benefit |
