| 引用本文: | 孙子秋,郭荫娟,樊陈琳,徐晓媛,许风国*.“双一流”背景下药学学科竞争力评价指标体系研究[J].中国现代应用药学,2023,40(4):545-553. |
| SUN Ziqiu,GUO Yinjuan,FAN Chenlin,XU Xiaoyuan,XU Fengguo.Research on Evaluation Index System of Pharmaceutical Discipline Competitiveness Under the Background of “Double First-Class”[J].Chin J Mod Appl Pharm(中国现代应用药学),2023,40(4):545-553. |
|
| 摘要: |
| 目的 构建能够体现药学学科特色和发展规律的指标体系，推动我国药学高等教育内涵式发展。方法 运用文献分析法、比较研究法分析药学学科的内涵以及学科竞争力的影响因素。通过2轮德尔菲法和层次分析法确定评价指标体系的内容和权重。结果 药学学科竞争力评价指标体系包含学科资源竞争力、学科产出竞争力、学科管理竞争力以及学科环境竞争力4个一级指标，师资力量、学科平台、学科声誉、科研项目及科研经费、人才培养、科学研究水平、社会服务特色与贡献、学科文化与制度建设、信息化建设、政府资助以及市场竞争力11个二级指标，34个三级指标以及70个细化指标。结论 评价指标体系整合了学科管理、学科文化和学科环境等要素，评价参与者多样化，评价方式多元化，纳入了不良学术行为披露和药学学科的特色化指标。与现有评价指标体系相比，更能科学全面地评价高校药学学科建设情况。 |
| 关键词: “双一流”建设 药学学科 学科竞争力 指标体系 |
| DOI：10.13748/j.cnki.issn1007-7693.2023.04.019 |
| 分类号:R95 |
| 基金项目:江苏省研究生教育教学改革课题一般项目(JGKT22_C018) |
|
| Research on Evaluation Index System of Pharmaceutical Discipline Competitiveness Under the Background of “Double First-Class” |
|
SUN Ziqiu, GUO Yinjuan, FAN Chenlin, XU Xiaoyuan, XU Fengguo
|
|
China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China
|
| Abstract: |
| OBJECTIVE To construct an index system that can reflect the characteristics and development law of pharmacy, so as to promote the connotative development of pharmaceutical higher education in China. METHODS Using the methods of literature analysis and comparative research, this paper analyzes the connotation of pharmacy and the influencing factors of discipline competitiveness. The content and weight of the evaluation index system are determined by two rounds of Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. RESULTS The evaluation index system of pharmaceutical discipline competitiveness includes 4 first-class indicators: discipline resource competitiveness, discipline output competitiveness, discipline management competitiveness and discipline environment competitiveness, included 11 secondary indicators faculty, discipline platform, discipline reputation, scientific research projects and scientific research funds, talent training, scientific research level, social service characteristics and contributions, discipline culture and system construction, information construction, government funding and market competitiveness. There were 34 tertiary indicators and 70 detailed indicators. CONCLUSION The evaluation index system integrates the elements of discipline management, discipline culture and discipline environment, diversified evaluation participants and evaluation methods, and includes the disclosure of bad academic behavior and the characteristic indicators of pharmacy. Compared with the existing evaluation index system, it can more scientifically and comprehensively evaluate the construction of pharmaceutical discipline in colleges and universities. |
| Key words: “Double First-Class” construction pharmaceutical discipline discipline competitiveness index system |
